Samuels v. American Cyanamid Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
In a recent strict product liability case that was tried before me and a jury, the applicability of New York’s "informed intermediary doctrine”, requiring a pharmaceutical manufacturer to warn only the prescribing physician and not the ultimate user of the side effects and possible risks of prescription drugs was at issue.
I considered the rationale for this doctrine and case authority from this and other jurisdictions, and, based upon the facts of this case, I refused to apply the informed intermediary doctrine. So, I charged the jury that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Yates v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- NIEMIERA BY NIEMIERA v. SchniederSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- DiBartolo v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.