MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
This products liability action raises the question of the extent of a drug manufacturer’s duty to warn consumers of dangers inherent in the use of oral contraceptives. The plaintiffs brought suit against the defendant, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (Ortho), for injuries allegedly caused by Ortho’s birth control pills, and obtained a jury verdict in their favor. The defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The judge concluded that the defendant did not owe a duty to warn the plaintiffs, and entered judgment for Ortho. The plaintiffs appealed. We transferred the case to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Cottam v. CVS PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.