Legal Opinion
Christensen v. General Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 17, 1992No. C8-91-1876Published
1Opinion of the Court
482 N.W.2d 510 (1992)
Pearl CHRISTENSEN, Respondent,
v.
GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE, Appellant.
No. C8-91-1876.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 17, 1992.
Review Denied May 15, 1992.
Randall, J., Fuller, Gary T. LaFleur, Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella, Anoka, for respondent.
Arthur W. Priesz, Jr., Priesz & Jefferson, Wayzata, for appellant.
Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and RANDALL and SHORT, JJ.
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court's determination that respondent was alighting from a vehicle when injured and is entitled to No-Fault insurance benefits. We reverse.
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Classified Insurance Corp. v. VodinelichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. GarciaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.