Legal Opinion

In Re Black

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1967No. Crim. 10666PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Petitioner, presently confined at the Reception Guidance Center, California Institution for Men, Chino, California, seeks a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles denied his application for a new probation report and for probation in violation of rights guaranteed to him by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and by article I, section 13 of the Constitution of California. We issued an order directed to the Director of the Department of Corrections (director) to show cause why the relief prayed for by petitioner…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API