Legal Opinion

Baker v. Cameron

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1965PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiffs Met-All are in the home improvement contracting business. The issue is whether they must pay unemployment taxes on moneys paid for services to salesmen and applicators selling and installing roofing and siding; or, stated differently, whether the services performed by such salesmen and applicators constitute “employment” within the meaning of the Unemployment Compensation Act. The period involved is prior to the effective date of ORS 657.087 which exempted, among others, commissioned salesmen of roofing and siding. See Premier Products Co., Inc. v. Cameron, 240 Or 123, 400 P2d 227…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henzel v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Journal Publishing Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wallowa Valley Stages, Inc. v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rahoutis v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. All-State Construction Co. v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Standard Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API