Legal Opinion
Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1940PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
The controlling question herein is whether the services of claimant, Stradford, for plaintiff should be deemed to be employment subject to the terms of the Unemployment Compensation Law as amended by Oregon Laws 1937, chapter 398, p. 581, et seq., and further amended by Oregon Laws 1939, chapter 515, p. 1062, et seq.
The record discloses that on the 19th day of November, 1936, a contract in printed form was executed by plaintiff and claimant, which contract is known to this record as respondent’s exhibit A. It is also shown that services were required of claimant by plaintiff not mentioned in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Texas Co. v. MillsMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Zelney v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Zehender & Factor, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.