Gaston v. Smith
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARSON, Judge.
The defendant assigns as error the submission of the facts to the jury with an instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. This doctrine is applicable where the instrumentality which caused the damages was under the exclusive control of the defendant and it was such as does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence on the part of the defendant. O’Quinn v. Southard, 269 N.C. 385, 152 S.E. 2d 538 (1967) ; Page v. Sloan, 12 N.C. App. 433, 183 S.E. 2d 813 (1971). It is not necessary to show the precise negligent act of the defendant to invoke the doctrine of res ipsa.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Lea v. Carolina Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Page v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- O'QUINN v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snow v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- B&J Sales & Service Corp. v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983