Workman v. Bales
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Van Burén District Court. — C. W. Vermilion, Judge. Action on promissory note for $9,000. Defendants, by answer and counterclaim, pleaded fraud. Verdict of jury for defendants, which was remitted, and judgment entered against plaintiff for costs. Plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtDe G-raee, J.
— The defendants, T. E. Bales and Myrtle Bales, husband and wife, resided at Stockport, Iowa, the husband being engaged in the hardware business with his father, J. E. Bales. There was a garage next to the building in which the hardware business was conducted, and back of the garage was ■an electric light plant, owned- and conducted by T. E. Bales, who had been granted a light franchise by the town of Stock-port. The real estate upon which the electric light plant was situated belonged to the father, J. E. Bales.
In the fall of the year 1917, E. 0. Dayton came to Stock-port, and informed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rose v. Des Moines Valley R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Baxter v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Ahrens v. FentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Stoke v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Middle States Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Aldrich v. WorleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Vorpahl v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Vanarsdol v. FarlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Faust v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924