Legal Opinion

Vanarsdol v. Farlow

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 2, 1922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Harrison District Court. — E. B. Woodruff, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for fraud and false representations in a sale or exchange of lands. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $9,104. Defendant appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver., J.

1. ITraud: fraudulent representations : evidence in re value of property. — Prior to November 29, 1918, the defendant, Farlow, was the owner of 569 acres of unimproved land in Saskatchewan, Dominion of Canada. On the day named, he entered into a written contract to convey the property to one Beebe for the named consideration of $5,000. Soon thereafter, Beebe, alleging that he had been deceived by Farlow’s false and fraudulent representations, began legal proceedings to rescind the agreement. Later, Farlow and Beebe compromised their differences upon payment by Farlow of damages in the sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stoke v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Skeels v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Vaupel v. MulhallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Likes v. BaerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. Hess v. McCardellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buttitta v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API