Legal Opinion

Vorpahl v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 5, 1929No. 39077PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

Two general propositions are here involved. One relates to the plaintiff-appellee’s right to recover under a policy of disability insurance, and the other has to do with the defendant-appellant’s counterclaim, based on appellee’s fraud in procuring a settlement for a prior accident under an insurance contract.

Appellee’s claim was for total and partial disability. Compensation was asked by appellee for: First, total disability extending from February 1 to February 29, 1924; and second, partial disability during the period between and including March 1st to April 16th of the same year. During…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Assurance Co. v. TowleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Reinertson v. Consolidated Chemical Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Spencer v. TaggartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Workman v. BalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Andrew v. Darrow Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spreitzer v. Hawkeye State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Campfield v. RuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Morrow v. DowningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Birum-Olson Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Joseph Spreitzer Vs. Hawkeye State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API