Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2013No. 2012-KM-00192-SCTPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this conviction for driving under the influence (“DUI”) first offense, speeding, and littering, the State lost key evidence prior to the defendant’s de novo trial in county court, while it was under a court order to preserve the evidence. The State’s actions violated the defendant’s due process right to present a complete defense. Further, the county court improperly admitted proof of the radar device’s accuracy under the business records hearsay exception. However, sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s speeding conviction exists in the officer’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Justin Barrett Blakeney v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Tillis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
  4. Whitaker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. David Lee Lewis v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API