Lloyds of London Syndicate 2003 v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. of Ohio
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge
This Order considers whether a party properly can invoke work product protection to shield a document that it inadvertently produced. Defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company of Ohio argues that it can. Plaintiff Lloyds of London Syndicate 2003 takes the opposite position. After considering the parties’ arguments, the court concludes that work product protection applies to the document and grants defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (Doe. 84).
I. Factual Background
On November 7, 2016, plaintiff deposed defendant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGSCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Employer's Reinsurance Corp. v. Clarendon National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- In re: CCA Recordings 2255 LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Orchestrate HR, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- TP ST Acquisition, LLC v. LindseyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022