Legal Opinion

Gronning v. Smart

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1977No. 14846PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Appeal from a declaratory judgment which held as constitutional certain legislative enactments appropriating funds from the State Insurance Fund to the Industrial Commission. Such an appropriation of trust funds by the Legislature is a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Article I, Section 7 of the Utah Constitution, and the decision below is reversed.

The Industrial Commission is a state agency which exercises the police power of the State as it applies to employment entirely without reference to the State Insurance Fund and its duties and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. American Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Chez, Atty. Gen. v. Industrial Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Tolman v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hansen v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Tax Commission v. Department of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Paoli v. Cottonwood HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Thompson v. Kentucky Reinsurance Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API