Hoskins v. City of Kirkland
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C.J.
This appeal principally involves the question of standing to attack a city ordinance purporting to vacate a portion of a street within the city of Kirkland so as to deprive plaintiffs of their claimed lights of access to their property. Plaintiffs appeal from the summary judgment dismissing their action.
Plaintiffs Hoskins own a 10-acre tract which, according to the scale map, is about 1,300 feet long and 330 feet wide. It lies immediately to the east of a tract of platted land known as' the Bridlewood Circle plat now within the city of Kirkland. The two tracts lie side by side, separated by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Ponischil v. Hoquiam Sash & Door Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
- Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- London v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Sears v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Marks v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Williams Place, LLC v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- DeWeese v. City of Port TownsendCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.