Parker v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
The principal issue before us is one of judicial immunity. We shall hold that it applies in the circumstances of this case.
The relevant facts are undisputed. On April 14, 1988, appellant was convicted in the District Court of speeding, for which she was fined $150 and assessed $5 court costs. She appealed the judgment to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, where a de novo trial was scheduled for July 26. Appellant failed to appear, however, and so the court, pursuant to Md.Rule 1314 c., determined that she had waived her right to a de novo trial, dismissed the appeal,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Davis v. DiPinoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Tucker v. WooleryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994