Graham v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
The two-year limitation is inapplicable to Miss Graham’s right of action: Moses v. Indemnity Co., 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 13; West v. MacMillan, 301 Pa. 344. Plaintiff’s right to recover is not barred by alleged failure of Alquist to cooperate with defendant: Conroy v. Ins. Co., 292 Pa. 219; Malley v. Indemnity Co., 297 Pa. 216; Moses v. Indemnity Co., 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 13.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
In this action of assumpsit, the plaintiff, Helen A. Graham, seeks to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by the defendant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to one Dr. C. E. Alquist, the amount of a judgment secured by her against him, and which, because of his insolvency, was not paid. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed.
During the life of the policy (of which the pertinent provisions are set forth in the note) plaintiff, while a passenger in Alquist’s automobile, was injured. She sued…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Kocher v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- A. Rose & Son, Inc. v. Zurich General Accident, Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- McClellan Et Ux. v. MadontiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Ziegler v. RyanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.