Harding v. Clackamas County

Petitioner Schurgin Development Corporation (Schurgin) seeks review of LUBA’s order reversing Clackamas County’s vacation of a portion of Southeast 90th Avenue, a county road, which abuts Schurgin’s planned Clackamas Promenade development project. Respondent Harding is the holder of a recorded easement that provides access to the vacated street from the athletic club which she operates.1 Schurgin was the applicant for the vacation. At the time it applied, Schurgin did not own all of the properties abutting the street, although it was in the process of purchasing them. The county made the…