Legal Opinion
Grapes v. Rocque
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This is an action of contract in the form of general assumpsit to recover on a promissory note the material parts of which, as appears from the specification filed with the writ, are as follows:
“$900.00 Newport, Vermont, October 8, 1920.
On demand we each as principal jointly and severally promise to pay the David I. Grapes, Nine Hundred Dollars, with interest, at its Banking Rooms in Barton, Vermont. * * *
John T. Rocque.”
and two small items not involved in the questions presented for review.
The. defendant pleaded in bar, that the note had been altered since it was delivered to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Erickson v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Horn v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Van Vliet v. KanterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Gray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tyrrell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Eastern States Agricultural & Industrial League v. Estate of VailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Conn Boston Co. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Hooper, Trustee v. KennedySupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Roberge v. Town of TroySupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.