Van Vliet v. Kanter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Frederick Kanter, from ah order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of November, 1909, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the plaintiff rendered on the 27th day of April, 1909.
1Opinion of the Court
Laughlin, J.:
The single question presented by this appeal is whether' a note without interest, payable on demand after date at a particular place, draws interest before demand or before the commencement of the *604action, which would be equivalent to a demand. The note on which the action is founded is as follows:
“■$150 00/100 Hew Yobk, March 14, 1898.
“ On demand after date I promise to pay to the order of George Van Vliet One Hundred & Fifty 00/100 Dollars, at my store 852 B’way. Value received.
“ FRED’K KAHTER.” ■
There is no evidence that payment of the note was demanded until the 2d day of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McMullen v. . RaffertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Hills v. . PlaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- President, Directors & Co. of Rensselaer Glass Factory v. ReidCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1825
- Gaylord v. Van LoanNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Ledyard v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grapes v. RocqueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Estate of McAskill v. McLeodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Hestnar v. SchetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gliklad v. CherneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Estate of ColeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.