Legal Opinion

Timko v. Oakwood Custom Coating, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2001No. Docket 212927PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGage, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendant.1 The trial court granted defendant summary disposition of plaintiff’s age discrimination claims pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (statute of limitations). We affirm.

On August 26, 1996, plaintiff, at age seventy-one, began tool and die work for defendant. On August 28, 1996, plaintiff signed a three-paragraph portion of defendant’s employment application labeled “Authorization and Understanding.” Among other things, the understanding provided for plaintiff’s agreement that the parties’ employment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Camelot Excavating Co., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Amir Soltani Amir Dowlatshahi Ruben R. Vega Abdul K. Kabir v. Western & Southern Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Barbrie Logan v. MGM Grand Detroit CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  4. Connie Thurman John Thurman v. Daimlerchrysler, Inc., James Stanford Pittman, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Mazera v. Varsity Ford Management Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API