Legal Opinion
United States v. Virginia Clark
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1999No. 98-50371PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Virginia Clark appeals her conviction, following trial to the court, and sentence for practicing law without a license and holding herself out as being entitled to practice law by representing three Marines at their general Courts-Martial in violation of California Business and Professions Code § 6126, as assimilated by the Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 7 and 13. We must decide whether this particular section of state law, which makes it a misdemeanor to hold oneself out as entitled to practice law or otherwise to practice law without being an active member…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Eric J. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vickers v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Randall Wilson BrittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Daly v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- United States v. DotsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006