Legal Opinion
United States v. Weber
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2006No. 05-50191PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Matthew Henry Weber appeals the district court’s imposition of several conditions of his supervised release.1 Because Weber raises all the challenges addressed in this memorandum disposition for the first time on appeal, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Rearden, 349 F.3d 608, 618 (9th Cir.2003).
1. Weber’s contention that the supervised release condition requiring him to submit to polygraph testing as part of his participation in a sex offender treatment program violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination2 is foreclosed by our recent decision in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lawrence Antelope, United States of America v. Lawrence AntelopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. LientzColorado Court of Appeals · 2012