Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Aston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 2, 2003No. SCBD No. 4810. OBAD No. 1573PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSummers, J.

T1 This proceeding was brought by the Bar Association to discipline Respondent, Michael Aston, for his drug-related conduct that resulted in a felony conviction and two misdemeanor convictions.

12 The Bar requests that Aston be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months with a following probation for two years. The Trial Panel also recommended a six-month suspension with a two-year probation. Aston argues that suspension would cause an economic hardship, and that protection of the public is afforded by random drug testing during his probation.

T3 On October 2, 2002, in Cause…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoluskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API