Legal Opinion

Ex parte Eastham

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Habeas corpus by one Eastiiam. Prisoner remanded by operation of law, because of a divided court.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

Eastiiam, being confined in the jail of Tucker County under a mittimus from a justice and an indictment for murder, obtained from a judge of this Court a writ of habeas corpus seeking discharge, or, if that be not granted, *638then that he he granted bail. As to his application for release on grounds alleged to work the nullity of the indictment, I can not favor it, for reasons given in my opinion in the case of prohibition, this term, of Eastham v. Holt, 27 S. E. 883. And, if the indictment were even void, that would not discharge, for there is the commitment by the justice,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ex parte EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Eastham v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Quarrier's CaseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex parte HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Ex parte VeltriWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Shamblin v. HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API