Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Holt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Petition of one Eastham for a writ of prohibition directed to one Holt, judge of the Circuit Court. 'Writ-denied by operation of law, because of a divided Court.

1Opinion of the Court

BRAnnon, Judge:

Eastham was indicted in the Circuit Court of Tucker County for the murder of Thompson, and he obtained from a judge of this Court a rule against the judge of the cir*601cuit. court of that county to show cause why a writ of prohibition should not be awarded to him to prohibit the circuit court from further proceeding upon said' indictment. The State of West Virginia moves to discharge that rule as improvidently awarded, and thus we have the question whether prohibition lies in this matter. This Court has repeatedly laid down, in harmony with the law elsewhere, that the writ of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. The People v. . PetreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. McConiha v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Parker v. . MarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newhart v. PennybackerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. CarduffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ritz v. KingdonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sperry v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API