Legal Opinion

Ex parte Mooney

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1885PublishedCited by 74 opinions

The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court •. ^

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

Upon the petition of John Mooney, alleging that he was detained, confined' and restrained of his liberty by W. C. Handlan, sheriff of Ohio county, in the jail of said county, without authority of law, a judge of the circuit court of said county on June 5,1885, in vacation awarded a writ of habeas corpus, commanding said sheriff to produce before him the body of said Mooney, together with the cause of his being detained. The respondent on the same day produced before the judge the said Mooney, and in his return stated that he detained him by virtue of a judgment of the said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Ex Parte Tobias WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  4. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Beckett v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Browning v. TuckerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Medley v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. State ex rel. Nicholson v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API