Legal Opinion

Ex parte Hill

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Application of A. T., Hill for a writ of -habeas corpus to be allowed bail.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

Hill having been convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for felony for receiving stolen goods, obtained a writ of error, and then petitioned the circuit court of Marion' County to be allowed bail until the decision of the writ of error, and that court having refused bail, he coinés to this' Court by petition for a writ of habeas corpus in order to have this Court to grant him bail.

The case does not involve the question discussed in Ex Parte Eastham, 43 W. Va. 637, whether upon habeas corpus seeking bail only this Court can grant bail before conviction. In' that case the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte EasthamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex parte DoyleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. GaryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. GaryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. BouchelleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Burford v. McKeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API