Legal Opinion
State of New York v. Morton Salt Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 5, 1967No. Civ. A. 40919, 33781, 37159-37169, 37173, 37174PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
Plantiffs seek to recover damages under the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 (1914), 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, for the defendants’ alleged conspiracy to establish, maintain and fix the price of rock salt. Interrogatories propounded by the plaintiffs for the specific purpose of establishing venue in this district were objected to by defendants Cayuga Rock Salt Company (“Cayuga”) and High way Materials Co., Inc. (“Highway”). By stipulation the parties have resolved most of the original objections. We have before us the two areas of dispute which still remain.
Both…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Farmers Bank of State of Del. v. Bell Mtg. Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Albert Levine Associates v. Bertoni & CottiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Fashion Two Twenty, Inc. v. SteinbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.