Hardeman v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STAY
VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge
I
Monsanto argues that Hardeman’s failure-to-warn claims are preempted by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Roden-ticide Act, which prohibits states from “imposing] ... any requirements for labeling or packaging in addition to or different from” the requirements in FIFRA itself. 7 U.S.C. § 136v(b). But Hardeman’s failure-to-warn claims based on Roundup’s labeling are not preempted, because “a state-law labeling requirement is not preempted by § 136v(b) if it is equivalent to, and fully…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Skye Astiana v. the Hain Celestial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blitz v. Monsanto Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- David Schaffner, Jr. v. Monsanto CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- In re Dicamba Herbicides Litig.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019
- In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Beyond Pesticides v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.