Legal Opinion

In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 7, 2019No. MDL No. 2741; Case No. 16-md-02741-VCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Vince Chhabria, United States District Judge

Beyond its motion for summary judgment on causation, Monsanto moved for summary judgment against the three bellwether plaintiffs on four other grounds. Specifically, Monsanto contended that: (i) the plaintiffs' claims are expressly preempted by federal law; (ii) the plaintiffs' claims are impliedly preempted; (iii) the evidence is insufficient to support a jury verdict for the plaintiffs on their failure-to-warn claims; and (iv) the evidence is *1087insufficient to support a punitive damages award. The Court previously informed the parties that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Mut. Pharm. Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. David Schaffner, Jr. v. Monsanto CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  2. Carson v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020
  3. Holyfield v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Johnson v. Monsanto Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Johnson v. Monsanto CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API