Legal Opinion
Kerin v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1978No. Civ. 17295PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REGAN, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying his petition for a peremptory writ of mandate in which he sought to compel the payment of certain sums of unemployment insurance benefits which had been denied to him by the defendant board.
Plaintiff contends the trial court (and the board) erred in interpreting Unemployment Insurance Code section 926, which defines wages. He also contends it was error to make use of a United States Supreme Court case (Social Security Board v. Nierotko (1946) 327 U.S. 358 [90 L.Ed. 718, 66 S.Ct. 637, 162 A.L.R. 1445])…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bradshaw v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Jones v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Powell v. California Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Wardall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mrkonjich v. Erie Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Molnar v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997