Legal Opinion

Mrkonjich v. Erie Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1983No. C3-82-1003, C7-82-1344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

The above matters have been consolidated on appeal. Each involves a denial of unemployment compensation. The basis for denial in each case was that the relevant benefit year included a period of time covered by a back pay award. The Department of Economic Security ruled that the time accounted for by the back pay period could not be credited in computing eligibility for unemployment compensation. We reverse.

Michael Mrkonjich worked for the Erie Mining Company (“Erie”) as a pipe changer from May 1, 1978, to August 1, 1979, when he was discharged for misconduct. He filed a claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Hiserote Homes, Inc. v. RiedemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Griggs v. SandsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Texas Employment Commission v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Department of Labor and Industry v. SmallsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Havill v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. Robertson v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Tuma v. Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Donald Bergs, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API