Legal Opinion
Reilly v. Ernst & Young, LLP
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 2007PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.:
¶ 1 Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Ernst & Young, LLP (“Ernst & Young”), successor to Arthur Young & Company, appeals from the judgment entered on April 23, 2004, in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County. After careful review, we vacate and remand for a new trial.
¶ 2 The instant action arises out of the execution of a Ponzi scheme, wherein interests in real property owned by Canterbury Village, Inc., were oversold through a second company called Earned Capital Corporation.1 Prior to October 21, 1987, Appellees, Thomas and Barbara Reilly (“the Reillys”), jointly owned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Monroe Contract Corp. v. Harrison Square, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Steinfurth v. LaMannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pride Contracting, Inc. v. Biehn Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cove Centre, Inc. v. Westhafer Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Zauflik v. Pennsbury School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Fratzola v. Klepadlo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.