Legal Opinion

Newhouse v. Probert

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided April 15, 1985No. G83-1364 CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RE PENDING MOTIONS

HILLMAN, District Judge.

This is a civil rights action brought by plaintiff, pro se, against several federal officials and private citizens. Jurisdiction is based upon the United States Constitution, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that the named defendants, along with as yet unnamed state law enforcement officials, violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights in the course of gathering information for a federal criminal tax prosecution. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, money damages, costs and attorney fees.

This matter is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Committee in Solidarity With the People of El Salvador (Cispes) v. William F. Sessions, Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  2. Fussell v. Georgia Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
  3. Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
  4. Quality Technology Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
  5. Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API