Newhouse v. Probert
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE PENDING MOTIONS
HILLMAN, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action brought by plaintiff, pro se, against several federal officials and private citizens. Jurisdiction is based upon the United States Constitution, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that the named defendants, along with as yet unnamed state law enforcement officials, violated plaintiff’s constitutional rights in the course of gathering information for a federal criminal tax prosecution. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, money damages, costs and attorney fees.
This matter is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Committee in Solidarity With the People of El Salvador (Cispes) v. William F. Sessions, Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Fussell v. Georgia Ports AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
- Kesterson v. Kent State Univ.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018
- Quality Technology Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
- Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.