Legal Opinion

Andes v. Ohio Atty. Gen.'s Office

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided May 10, 2017No. 2017-00144-PQPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Andes v. Ohio Atty. Gen.'s Office,

2017-Ohio-4251.] JODI ANDES Case No. 2017-00144-PQ Requester Special Master Jeffery W. Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE Respondent {¶1} R.C.149.43(C) provides that a person allegedly aggrieved by a violation of division (B) of that section may either commence a mandamus action, or file a complaint under R.C. 2743.75. In mandamus actions alleging violations of R.C. 149.43(B), a relator must establish by “clear and convincing evidence” that they are entitled to relief. State ex rel. Miller v. Ohio State Hwy. Patrol, 136…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Ohio State Highway PatrolOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Striker v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
  2. Doe v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2024
  3. Cleveland Ass'n of Rescue Employees/Ila Local 1975, Relator v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Langer v. Ohio State Univ. Office of Univ. Compliance & IntegrityOhio Court of Claims · 2023
  5. State ex rel. IdeaStream Pub. Media v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API