Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1908No. 21,109PublishedCited by 17 opinions

. Prom Criminal Court of Marion County (36,228); William, Irvin, Judge pro tem. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against William O. Armstrong. Prom a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of shaving and doing work pertaining to the trade and business of a barber and keeping his barber shop open on Sunday, in violation of an act prohibiting barbering and keeping open barber shops on Sunday (Acts 1907, p. 89, §§2365-2367 Burns 1908).

It is alleged that the court below erred in overruling appellant’s motion to quash each count of the affidavit, and 'in overruling his motion for a new trial.

There is no formal defect in the affidavit, but it is assailed on the ground that the statute upon which it was predicated is unconstitutional and void. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Petit v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ex parte JentzschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. FAIRCHILD, PROSECUTING ATTY., ETC. v. SchankeIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Clarke Auto Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API