Legal Opinion

Dufrense v. Hammersten

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1940No. 6832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, C. J.

During the summer of 1928 appellant loaned respondents the sum of $428 to pay for the completion of a house. Respondents gave appellant their note, bearing ten per cent (10%) interest and due in three years from date. Interest was paid regularly on the note to and beyond the time of its maturity. December 8, 1935, at appellant’s instance and request, respondents executed a note in lieu of the 1928 note, for the same amount of principal and bearing interest at the same rate, payable to appellant three years after date. Interest on the second note (at 10%) in the amount of $122.80 was paid up…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Lowry National Bank v. FickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kedey v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of Hoven v. RauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API