Missouri K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Perino
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Plaintiff had judgment against defendant railway company for $1,000 damages for the death of her son by the alleged negligence of defendant. A former judgment for plaintiff was reversed by this court (89 Okla. 136, 214 Pac. 907). Decision of this appeal requires reference both to the facts and law contained therein. The identical evidence in the former trial was resubmitted to the jury, wherefore we shall not here restate this ease. Defendant properly saved the record and requested…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mascho v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by18 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. RichersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. PettieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Billy v. Texas, O. & E. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.