Legal Opinion

Bryan Ornelas v. Markwayne Mullin

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 3, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00916Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRYAN ORNELAS, Case No. 25-cv-0916-BAS-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 14 MARKWAYNE MULLIN, PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED 15 Defendant. COMPLAINT (ECF No. 21) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to partially dismiss Plaintiff’s 18 amended complaint.1 (ECF No. 21.) Defendant moves to dismiss the third and fourth 19 causes of action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 12(b)(6). (Id.) 21 The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API