Legal Opinion

Hollomon v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1929No. 6959PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

In the granting clause of his deed to the Board of Education, Pearson, “for and in consideration of five dollars to him in hand paid,” bargained, granted, sold, and conveyed to said board, and its successors in office, a described acre of land, it being declared in this clause of the deed that said lot was “to be used by said Board of Education as a public school for whites.” In the habendum clause said board was “to have and to hold the same for the uses aforesaid forever.” Eor some years past the Board of .Education had not been conducting a school on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Martin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Laurens County Board of Education v. StanleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Jackson v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. King County v. Hanson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Fulford v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API