Legal Opinion

State v. Hiott

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 5, 1999No. 23337-1-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Armstrong, A.C.J.

Richard Hiott appeals his conviction in juvenile court of assault in the third degree. RCW 9A.36.031(l)(d), (f). The assault occurred during a game in which Hiott and his friend, Jose, were shooting at each other with BB guns. Jose was hit in the eye and lost his eye as a result. Hiott was charged with assault in the third degree; the trial court found him guilty, ruling that: “[a]t no time did either consent to be injured by the other, but both boys were engaged in a very reckless form of play . . . [and] this mutual play has lead [sic] to a crime.”

The question is whether…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Helton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. DejarlaisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. FransuaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MacKrillMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Baxter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API