Legal Opinion

State v. Simmons

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1962No. 35937PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue here is whether a defendant convicted of assault with intent to commit rape had a fair trial.

Our conclusion is that he did not. The accumulation of prejudicial incidents and misconduct, in a case where the factual issue was a very close one, tipped the scale so *383heavily against the defendant that any semblance of a fair trial was lost.

At least half of the twenty assignments of error on this appeal have some merit. Some of these relate to the conduct of the deputy prosecuting attorneys, and we have from time to time regretted, but condoned, similar conduct where the proof of guilt was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. GoebelWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. SevernsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Pearcy v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bachner v. PearsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. John Marshall and Charles Del Monico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API