Legal Opinion

Baxter v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. DA 09-0051PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 The State of Montana appeals from the Order of the First Judicial District Court granting summary judgment in favor of Robert Baxter, Stephen Speckart, M.D., C. Paul Loehnen, M.D., Lar Autio, M.D., George Risi, Jr., M.D., and Compassion & Choices; and from the District Court’s decision that a competent, terminally ill patient has a right to die with dignity under Article II, Sections 4 and 10 of the Montana Constitution, which includes protection of the patient’s physician from prosecution under the homicide statutes. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We rephrase the following…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sports Shooting Ass'n v. State, Mt. Dept. of FwpMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Montanans for the Responsible Use of the School Trust v. State Ex Rel. Board of Land CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. United National Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Horn v. Bull River Country Store Properties, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bitterroot River Protective Ass'n v. Bitterroot Conservation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re T.N.-S.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Kulstad v. ManiaciMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Horace Mann Insurance v. HankeMontana Supreme Court · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API