Helton v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Today we decide whether Indiana’s Criminal Gang Activity Statute is constitutional under the United States and Indiana Constitutions.
Appellant-defendant James W. Helton, II, appeals his conviction for Participating in Criminal Gang Activity, a Class D felony. 1
ISSUES
Helton raises several issues for our review:
1. Whether Indiana’s Criminal Gang Activity Statute (Gang Statute) is unconstitutional because:
A. It is void for vagueness under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and article 1, § 9 and § 31 of the Indiana Constitution.
B. It is unconstitutionally…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. CastenadaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Clifft v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MacKrillMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Parks v. Madison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.