Legal Opinion
In Re CHARGES OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT IN PANEL FILE NO. 39302
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 31, 2016No. A15-2078PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (the Director) issued a private admonition to appellant for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in Minnesota. Appellant demanded that the Director present the charge to a Panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (the Panel). Following an evidentiary hearing, the Panel affirmed the Director’s admonition, finding that appellant had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Minnesota, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 5.5(a), and that the misconduct was isolated and non-serious. Appellant…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Petition for Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41310Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41755Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel Case No. 44387Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Mark Boles, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024