Legal Opinion

In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel Case No. 44387

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 2019No. A18-2113Published

1Per curiam

In this discipline case, an attorney challenges the findings made by a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and the discipline imposed. We conclude that the panel's findings are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the appropriate discipline is a private admonition.

FACTS

In 2010, W.Y. purchased 14.63 acres of land from J.Y. W.Y.'s mortgage company refused to give him a mortgage unless the property was split into two pieces: Parcel A, which contained the homestead residence, and Parcel B, which contained several buildings used for farm operations.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sharood v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Heidbreder v. CartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against VarrianoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API