Keller v. Waddington
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent, Keller, recovered in the court below against the appellant, Waddington, for injuries to his person and injuries to his automobile, suffered in an automobile accident. The action was tried by tbe court, sitting without a jury, and is before us on questions of both law and fact.
The appellants first contend that the evidence is insufficient to support a recovery. As to the manner in which the accident giving rise to the injuries happened, the evidence is not in serious dispute. It occurred at the intersection of Fremont avenue with North Thirty-sixth street in the city of…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Bowman v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Flynn v. Helena Cab & Bus Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.