Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cramer

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1990No. 87CA1627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

In this quiet title action concerning rights under two oil and gas leases, the Davis lease and the Allensworth lease, both parties appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Plaintiffs, J.W.C. Davis and Gwendolyn Davis (the Davises), are the fee simple owners of the property at issue, except for a one-half, undivided interest in the mineral estate which had been reserved by their predecessors-in-interest, the Allensworths. On November 1, 1968, the Davises leased their mineral interest to the predecessor-in-interest of defendants, Gary Sandlin, Sand-lin Oil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. DillardTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Sohio Petroleum Co. v. v. S. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Hein Enterprises, Ltd. v. San Francisco Real Estate InvestorsColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Houston Production Co. v. Mecom Oil Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Davis v. CramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Davis v. CramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API