Legal Opinion

Houston Production Co. v. Mecom Oil Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1933No. 1252—5656PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEDDY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a second trial of the case. On the first trial plaintiff in error, »in an action of trespass to try title, recovered a judgment against defendant in error for 1.27 acres of land, and the defendant in error’s plea to he allowed expenditures it had incurred in drilling a producing oil well on the land out of funds in the hands of a receiver was deniécf.” "

An appeal was taken from this judgment to the Court of Civil Appeals. That court affirmed the judgment of the trial court in so far as it ¿warded the land in controversy to the plaintiff in error.' The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gulf Pro. Co. v. Angus SpearTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Alaska Placer Company v. LeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Broughton v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Moore v. Jet Stream Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API