Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cramer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 25, 1991No. 90SC133PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to review Davis v. Cramer, 793 P.2d 605 (Colo.App.1990), and now reverse and remand with directions. We limited our review to a determination of whether an implied duty to market gas arises during the primary term of an oil and gas lease, and whether the court of appeals erred in remanding this case to the trial court on the issue of breach of the drilling clause.

This dispute arises out of a complex series of claims and counterclaims, which is essentially a quiet title action pursuant to C.R.C.P. 105. The issues in this case depend upon the interpretation that is to be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. ReidTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Cole Petroleum Co. v. United States Gas & Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Libby v. De BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Stirman v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Garman v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Rogers v. Westerman Farm Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Patrick D. Leggett v. EQT Production Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API